15 Cents & U.S. Tariffs

I was elated to discover that this week I have earned 15 cents in revenue on my book Dr. StrangeJob Or: How I Learned to Stop Raging and Embrace the Bull. That is, until I realized my earnings were in Canadian cents, not U.S. cents. Even worse, this week was one of my better weeks for revenue.

Obviously, I need a new marketing strategy, but as a Canadian, I also want to do my bit to defend Canada against the Trump tariffs. Many have suggested that we tax items that the US still desperately requires from Canada. Toilet paper would be a good option, since Trump recently removed existing tariffs on Canadian toilet paper imports. Perhaps we should only sell them toilet paper that puts our views on Trump’s tariffs in proper perspective. In other words, we don’t want them to be wiped out of paper, but we also want them to understand who was responsible for the cost increase. It might be a bit of a crapshoot, but it is certainly worth a try. As part of an advertising campaign for the Canadian-branded toilet paper, we could change our “elbows up” slogan to “face up” in the end-user instruction manual.

So, what can Dr. StrangeJob do to support Canada in this senseless war?  Luckily, I also have something that they really need in the US – my book. Yes, I expect an extremely high demand for my book in the States. The section American Psycho – The Trump Connection alone should be enough to push my book onto the bestseller list.

Therefore, I have decided to stop selling my book in the US and to also place an import tax on purchases delivered to the U.S. That way, American buyers will pay an import surcharge when purchasing the book from Canada. The added revenue from the import tax will offset any lost revenue from not allowing Americans to buy my book in the States.

The whole idea of the tariff war is best summed up by the John Prine lyric: it don’t make much sense that common sense don’t make no sense no more. At least that is my 15 cents’ worth.

Find my book by searching Dr. StrangeJob on Amazon.ca.

Dr. StrangeJob is a satirical blogger, retired educator, social activist, actor, screenwriter, creator of Incompetents Anonymous (IA), and leader of the CBLA-InComps. He can be reached at drstrangejob@gmail.com. Follow him on Bluesky or Facebook @drstrangejob.

Dr. StrangeJob or: How I Learned to Stop Raging and Embrace the Bull

I finally started my book Dr. StrangeJob Or: How I Learned to Stop Raging and Embrace the Bull. I will post updates as things develop, but here is the introduction ‘to pique your interest.

Introduction

The Peter Principle was first published in 1969 by Dr. Lawrence J. Peter and Raymond Hull. The principle states: “In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.”  Although the Peter Principle refers to the incompetent as male, it is likely a reflection of the time the principle was developed rather than an assumption that only males are incompetent. On the other hand, I have met more incompetent males than females in my day, so maybe the authors were more insightful than I have given them credit for.

The classic example of the Peter Principle can be found in the field of education; take, for example, the competent teacher whose lack of administrative skills becomes painfully evident after being promoted to principal. If the promotion causes significant disruption in the workplace, then the principal is either promoted to district manager or remains in a state of incompetent stagnation until retirement. Simply put, given any hierarchy, all employees tend to rise to their level of incompetence.

The Peter Principle does not discriminate against race, age, sex, or political party (OK, maybe by political affiliation). Look to any hierarchical organization in which you belong to witness the Peter Principle in practice. Gaze down the organizational ladder, and you will see competent employees in search of a promotion or incompetent employees likely to receive a promotion. Gaze upwards on the organizational ladder, and you will find incompetent employees in search of a golden handshake or competent ones about to be downsized. Gaze in the mirror to determine your competence level, but do not be fooled by what you think you see.

If you cannot evaluate your competence level, then you may have already reached your level of incompetence within that particular hierarchical structure. However, if you can determine your competence level, there may still be hope for you – unless, of course, you are incompetent at judging competence.

It’s a Catch-22. If you can see incompetence within your hierarchy, you may not have reached your level of incompetence. If, on the other hand, you cannot see incompetence, then you are likely already there. In other words, you are either in on the joke of Dr. StrangeJob, or you are a part of the joke of Dr. StrangeJob. If you are in on the joke, then tag along for the ride. If you are a part of the joke, then you probably stopped reading by now and are likely beyond redemption.

Does Dr. StrangeJob have the competence to write a book on incompetence? I believe so because thirteen years of industry experience in information systems, thirteen years of full-time post-secondary teaching experience, and five years in post-secondary program management have provided daily opportunities to see the Peter Principle in practice.

Although some may disagree, I believe I have managed to maintain a semblance of sanity after surviving over 30 years in a workforce fraught with incompetence, insanity, cronyism, and nepotism or controlled by psychopaths, sociopaths, and arseholes. Somehow, I was always able to find humour in the chaos. This project is my attempt at maintaining that sanity.

The idea for this book came to me during my last day of work at a local university. At the time, I was in a managerial position, being reclassified into a position I did not want to pursue. Although not ready to retire, I decided it was my time to leave. As I cleared out my overhead file cabinet, I stumbled upon an old file folder brimmed with work-related musings, notes, clippings, anecdotes, emails, and organizational reflections I had collected during my work career. The file folder was labelled “Work Shit,” and each item had not only passed my initial smell test but also managed to remain fragrant with each successive viewing.

I had the idea to use the folder’s contents as fodder for a satirical look at life in the workplace, but I needed a framework to tie the material together. Circumstances and three disparate events collided to form a skeleton for the manuscript.

  1. I recently purchased the fortieth-anniversary edition of The Peter Principle by Lawrence J. Peter and Raymond Hull. The principle is as applicable today as it was in 1969.
  2. I watched the forty-fifth anniversary edition of Stanley Kubrick’s film Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Unfortunately, the film’s subtext is as relevant today as it was in 1964. Oh, my precious bodily fluids.
  3. I reorganized my home library and stumbled upon my collection of Kurt Vonnegut Jr. novels.

Presto!!!

The framework became a satirical text of propositions ruminating on the continued relevance of the Peter Principle within the context of my work experience.

And so it goes…

Dr. StrangeJob is a satirical blogger, retired educator, social activist, actor, screenwriter, creator of Incompetents Anonymous (IA), and interim leader of the CBLA-InComps. He can be reached at drstrangejob@gmail.com. Follow him on Twitter @drstrangejob or Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/drstrangejob.

Un-Civil Municipal Politics & Fire Hydrants

Note: This is a reprint of a blog originally posted on the local community website goCapeBreton.com, but the topic remains relevant to anyone dealing with incompetent municipal politicians.

You never know what type of animal will run in civic politics. In 2014, a seven-year-old canine by the name of Duke The Dog was elected Mayor of Cormorant, Minnesota. In 2015, Giggles the Pig attempted to run for Mayor in Flynt, Michigan. Then there was Morris the Cat, a mayoralty candidate in Xalapa, Mexico in 2013. Let us not forget, Tiao, the ill-tempered chimpanzee that received 400,000 mayoralty votes in Rio de Janeiro in 1988. Or how about Stubbs the Cat that was elected Mayor of TalkeetngoCapeBreton.com a, Alaska in 1977. Closer to home, Tuxedo Stan, a cat from Halifax, was a mayoral candidate in the 2012 municipal elections.

Just because any dog, cat, pig, or chimpanzee can run civically doesn’t mean they are civil at heart. It does mean, however, that when the common folk get fed up with the status quo, they often come up with creative ways to protest. Dr. Strangejob is neither pig, dog, or chimpanzee, but he does concede that he has often been referred to as a cool-cat.

In follow up to his well past shock and appalled post, Dr. StrangeJob wants to inform all CBRM municipal candidates that he believes that the single most important issue in CBRM is the fact that one in three Cape Breton children live in poverty. For some reason, our politicians (municipal, provincial, and federal) choose not to emphasize this travesty on their way to and from the political trough.

Perhaps the issue of poverty doesn’t make for good photo-ops. Perhaps the issue of poverty is not of concern because the one in three children suffering from poverty are not of voting age. Perhaps it’s because the families suffering in poverty are not in a financial position to contribute to election campaigns. Fortunately, Cape Breton has a new online news outlet called The Cape Breton Spectator  attempting to keep this issue in the forefront. Unfortunately, her efforts are not enough. We must require all CBRM candidates to propose solutions to the issue of poverty in their election platforms. Perhaps a little incentive is necessary.

Dr. StrangeJob is putting CBRM council on notice. Consider the fact that not all un-human candidates in protest-vote election campaigns have been animate objects. There was, for example, the Fire Hydrant that ran for the Board of Governors at the University of British Columbia but lost by a mere six votes. Let this be a cautionary tale for CBRM politicians not willing to address the issue of poverty. If you do not address the poverty issue, then your constituents may just find some old dog to run against you – and we all know what old dogs do to fire hydrants. That would just be uncivil.

Dr. StrangeJob

Like Dr. StrangeJob on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/drstrangejob
Follow Dr. StrangeJob on Twitter at https://twitter.com/drstrangejob
Learn more about Dr. StrangeJob at www.drstrangejob.ca